Can I claim for a cycle accident if I was wearing headphones?

Cyclists are vulnerable road users and therefore need to maintain awareness of their surroundings in order to avoid accidents.

Many external factors can impact on their safety - for instance other road users, road conditions and unexpected obstacles.

If you have brought a claim for injuries sustained in a cycling accident the Court will assess how the accident happened - the circumstances behind the collision, who was involved and whether it could have been avoided. This is to determine the liability - i.e. who was to blame?

How does the Court decide who is liable?

The Court will ask many questions around the accident and there may be many complexities to consider. For example:

The Court will also want to learn more about the cyclist, such as:

Paying attention to other road users and road conditions

Being observant of other road users and the state of the road is key for any road user. Although cyclists cause fewer and less serious accidents to others, they must still follow the Highway Code which under Rule 67 states:

You should

If a cyclist has failed to observe these (non-statutory) rules he may be found partly liable for his accident and injuries.

The distractions caused by wearing headphones

Many cyclists listen to music through headphones whilst cycling; however this popular practice may interfere with the cyclist's concentration.

For example, he may be unable to hear traffic noise around him, or be unaware of the sirens of emergency vehicles. His reaction time to hazards may be slower.

He may be momentarily distracted by changing the playlist or programme on his device, whilst still cycling - and not looking ahead may collide with another object or vehicle, or fail to see a pothole in the road.

Would this be contributory negligence?

When the Court is assessing the damages payable for injury, the Defendant may claim that the cyclist's distraction was partly to blame for the injuries sustained in order to reduce the amount paid.

To apply a reduction to the damages awarded the Court must establish that the cyclist must have been at fault and that the fault must have contributed to his injury. It must also determine whether the injuries might have been less severe or avoided altogether.

For example: if a cyclist had not avoided a pothole in the road because he was adjusting the volume on his MP3 player, although accident may have been caused by the failure of the local highways authority to repair the pothole, the cyclist may be found to have contributed to his accident through his own negligent behaviour.

This could lead to a percentage reduction (for contributory negligence) in the compensation awarded.

Using an experienced cycling injury solicitor

The National Cycling Charity (NCC) has campaigned to have the policy of the law changed so that findings of contributory negligence are exceptional and not found against cyclists who commit technical breaches of the Highway Code's non-statutory rules (e.g Rule 67).

However the Courts still seem willing to make reductions in damages to cyclists; therefore instructing an experienced cycling injury solicitor who can guide the Court through the complexities of your accident will ensure the best outcome for your claim.


Cycling Injury Legal is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (Ref number: 835858). Registration is recorded on the FCA website Company No: 08914207. VAT No: 229015134.

Personal injury-related enquiries are handled by our partners at National Accident Helpline.

We charge our solicitors for the marketing and operational services we provide and these costs are not passed on to our customers.

*No Win, No Fee: Under a No Win, No Fee Agreement fees may apply if a claimant refuses to cooperate or abandons their claim after the legal work has started, or if the claim is fraudulent.

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes legal advice or gives rise to a solicitor/client relationship. Specialist legal advice should be taken in relation to specific circumstances.